======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


I really feel I must intervene in this debate.

In France, there is a long standing tradition of "anarcho-marxism", or 
rather "Libertarian Marxism", to which I belong.

Since the 1950s, groups such as "Socialisme ou barbarie" or the 
situationists, such thinkers as the great Marxian editor (and 
re-discoverer of Marx's  "Grundrisse") Maximilien Ruben or Daniel 
Guerin, have pointed out that Marx was indeed an "anarchist" in many of 
his writings.

That is precisely the point council communists try to make, when they 
oppose Leninism :  a true understanding of marxism, of the emancipation 
of the working class, entails  the  abolition of class-based  authority, 
and thus the state.

The state must be superseded by concils (soviets) which are a direct 
manifestation of the people's will. If the Leninists have their way, 
they will simply replace the bosses with bureaucrats who will extract 
the surplus-value of the working-class for their own, party-orientated 
ends. Whats's the difference between working 60 hours a week for a boss 
or for the Party ? You are still alienated from the fruits of your 
labour. There is even less democracy than before, and you get shot for 
voicing your dissent.

Workers have nothing to gain from Leninism but new chains. They must 
form their own councils and run their affairs themselves. they may 
indeed institute a kind of "state", that is a federation of all 
councils, in order to coordinate production. This is what the CNT did 
during the Spanish Civil war before they, as the "Trotskyite" POUM, were 
anihilated by Stalin's Comunist Party. 

The Spanish CNT was composed of many different tendencies (some of which 
were in fact marxists). It was, after all, a "mass" organization of over 
3 million members. It defined itself as "revolutionary syndicalist", and 
its aim was "libertarian communism". It actually managed to militarily 
defeat the Comunist Party of Spain in some regions, rushing to battle 
with the cries of "Death to Hitler ! Death to Stalin ! Deeath to 
Mussolinni". In other regions, it cooperated with the PC. The CNT 
decided, after a national Congress, to send three ministers to 
participate in the revolutionary government. At the time, a large 
faction of the CNT saw this as a betrayal of anarchism, but a still 
larger faction saw this as a necessary step to ensure that the worker's 
councils would not be utterly destroyed by a CP(Stalinist)-led 
government bent on defeating workers' control because worker's control 
was not directed by the Stalinists.

Historically, every time workers have enjoyed autonomy and 
self-managment that was not subservent to a Leninist party, the latter 
has arrogantly condemned the former for "anarchism". In the eyes of 
Leninists, "anarchism" is a catch-all phrase that means refusal to 
understand the need for a MArxist-Leninist party to control the 
government and enforce obedience.

 



________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: [email protected]
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to