======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


There have been scientific teams measuring and filming the melting of
glaciers, the polar caps, the permafrost on all angles for many years.
Quibbling about this or that study or this or that glacier (based on
misinformation, mostly) is simply an excuse to ignore the undeniable fact of
global warming.

In fact, there's no reason to think the "deniers" here actually care enough
to get anything of it right.  It's sophomoric argument for argument's sake.

It's one thing to miss the big forest for the trees, but these people are
focusing on a pixel that's not green and postulating a conspiracy that trees
are actually blue.

Frankly, the patience of the moderator with all of this (I hope it's
amusement as much as anything) astonishes me.

This entire discussion reminds me of a student who brought her mommy in with
her to complain about getting a failing grade on the paper.  Mom hadn't
actually read the paper, so I asked her to read the first paragraph.  It
explained how Columbus forced the Indians to get on the boat with him, took
them forcibly to America, and treated them very badly once they got here.
Mom was taken aback for a milli-second, but, without skipping a beat, began
insisting that her darling had hit all the main points--Columbus, Indians
and America--and the rest were merely details over which I was being
arbitrarily picky.

ML
________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: [email protected]
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to