====================================================================== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. ======================================================================
Angelus Novus wrote: > > I think that this 'criticism' misunderstands the type of book that > Milios and Sotiropoulos probably intended to write. You're assuming > that Milios and Sotiropoulos share your opinion that a) their exists > a phenomenon that can coherently or meaningfully be understood by the > concept of 'imperialism', and b) that the attempts to develop this > concept by Lenin, et al has anything at all to do with Marx's > critique of political economy. The same thing can be said about Hardt and Negri, who also sought to refute Lenin. Their book is filled with empty theorizing. Sotiropoulos and Milios are just as bad, well almost as bad. For example, in their entire discussion of Emmanuel's "unequal exchange", there is not a single economic datum. I find this remarkable. ________________________________________________ Send list submissions to: [email protected] Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
