You're right, name calling isn't an arguement. You have proven yourself over and over again nothing more than a revisionist so it is natural for a revisionist not to accept the truth otherwise they would not persist in the their traitorous class position. Since you show you are an arrogant opportunist and proven your nature calling you what you are is all that is left until the day of judgement for your ilk arises and it will.
--- On Fri, 1/21/11, waistli...@aol.com <waistli...@aol.com> wrote: From: waistli...@aol.com <waistli...@aol.com> Subject: Re: [MLL] The Communist society thesis: Goodbye Stalin To: marxist-leninist-list@lists.econ.utah.edu Date: Friday, January 21, 2011, 5:35 AM Name calling is not a convincing argument. All that is required is for one single person to show, based on what Marx wrote, my revision of Marx presentation on this question of communist society. Not two people but . . . .1. WL. _______________________________________________ Marxist-Leninist-List mailing list Marxist-Leninist-List@lists.econ.utah.edu To change your options or unsubscribe go to: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxist-leninist-list _______________________________________________ Marxist-Leninist-List mailing list Marxist-Leninist-List@lists.econ.utah.edu To change your options or unsubscribe go to: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxist-leninist-list
