On 9/7/2020 4:24 PM, Louis Proyect wrote:

https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S0921800920300938


    Highlights

•

    We provide empirical evidence that supports the theory of
    ecologically unequal exchange.

•

    High-income nations are net importers of embodied materials,
    energy, land, and labor.

•

    High-income nations gain a monetary trade surplus via this
    resource appropriation.

•

    Lower-income nations provide resources but experience monetary
    trade deficits.

•

    The observed inequality is systemic and hampers global
    sustainability in multiple ways.

This is a fine group of researchers, long promoting a richer sense of North-South power than in most eco-unconscious accounts of imperialism.

The idea of unequal ecological exchange is one that, back in 1972, Samir Amin had flagged:

   The partitioning of the continent which was completed by the end of
   the nineteenth century multiplied the means available to the
   colonialists to attain capital at the centre. We must remember that
   their target was the same everywhere: to obtain cheap exports. But
   to achieve this, capital at the centre - which had now reached the
   monopoly stage - could organise production on the spot, and there
   exploit both the cheap labour and the natural resources, by wasting
   or stealing them, i.e. by paying a price which did not enable
   alternative activities to replace them when they were
   exhausted.//This problem of the looting of natural resources is
   beginning to be studied with the present-day awareness
   of'environmental problems', although the term is ambiguous.

He still thought this work to be highly important, e.g. in a 2018 book published by MR just after his death:

   capitalist accumulation is founded on the destruction of the bases
   of all wealth: human beings and their natural environment. It took a
   wait lasting a century and a half until our environmentalists
   rediscovered that reality, now become blindingly clear. It is true
   that historical Marxisms had largely passed an eraser over the
   analyses advanced by Marx on this subject and taken the point of
   view of the bourgeoisie – equated to an atemporal ‘rational’ point
   of view – in regard to the exploitation of natural resources.

There's a new set of tributes to Amin over at MR Online, with quite a few essays: https://mronline.org/2020/09/04/celebrating-the-life-of-samir-amin/

I think three modifications of the article circulated above could be made. First, I miss the sense of not just North and South, but also the layer of subimperial economies that are in many cases now the frontline of extractivist corporate exploiters. Here's more: http://roape.net/2018/04/18/towards-a-broader-theory-of-imperialism/ (In the article above, this dilemma is treated as if China is solely the transmission belt, but the idea of subimperialism, drawn from Mauro Marini and David Harvey, is much broader.)

Second, there's an interesting dilemma with respect to future generations' ability (and 'right') to draw upon non-renewable resources we are currently depleting.

Third, there's the matter of whether progressives and anti-extractivist movements can count 'natural capital' - central to the bourgeois institutions' methodology for assessing environmental 'values' albeit not discussed in the article above - without resorting to market systems such as carbon trading or offsets. Fierce debating rages on that point.

I've done a few rough-draft teaching videos on these questions, below; and have been working on lots more essays if anyone's interested. Again, they follow in the anti-imperialist tradition of Amin and of the first Marxist scholar of Africa, Rosa Luxemburg, who was acutely aware of the capitalist/non-capitalist articulations when it came to defining imperialism: https://www.mattersburgerkreis.at/dl/rpOsJMJKOoOJqx4KooJK/JEP_1-2019_Rosa_Luxemburg_Bond.pdf

Cheers,

Patrick

*
<https://vimeo.com/438888520><https://vimeo.com/438888520>*

*_71 - Natural resources and environmental crises <https://vimeo.com/438888520>_*

*<https://vimeo.com/438536419>*

*
<https://vimeo.com/438536419><https://vimeo.com/438536419>*

*_72 - Conflicting Environmental Resource Narratives <https://vimeo.com/438536419>_*

*<https://vimeo.com/439922580>*

*
<https://vimeo.com/439922580><https://vimeo.com/439922580>*

*_73 - Natural Riches, Curses and Resource Depletion <https://vimeo.com/439922580>_*

*<https://vimeo.com/439922729>*

*_<https://vimeo.com/439922729>_*

*_74 - African and SA Natural Resource Stewardship <https://vimeo.com/439922729>_*


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#1247): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/1247
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/76687310/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES &amp; NOTES<br />#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a 
message.<br />#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly &amp; permanently archived.<br 
/>#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/1316126222/xyzzy  
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to