I am a member of the PSL,before that I had been a Green for seventeen 
years,from 2000 to 2017.I joined the Green Party,in 2000,for three 
reasons.First,because of Ralph Nader,who many believe was the strongest 
candidate the GP ever had.Second because I did not want to see another Bush 
become president,and,third,because I felt Al Gore was,at that time,the 
weakest,most centrist,candidate,the Democrats had ever offered.Little did we 
know how bad things would get.

In that time,we have seen little to no growth in the Green Party,on a national 
level.Indeed their influence may have shrunk since 2000.We can talk about how 
the demonization of Nader,especially from liberals,who now love 
Dubya,elsewhere.In my seventeen years of working with the Green Party,in New 
Mexico,I saw little to no growth in the party,on any level.In fact the opposite 
was true.Our membership only continued to contract.For much of the 2000s,it was 
a struggle to even stay on the ballot.Then came 2016,where Jill Stein was 
smeared as a Russian asset,who was helping Putin throw the election to 
Trump.Where were others on the left,coming to Jill Stein's defense?Other than a 
few marginalized voices,like Jimmy Dore,they were few and far between.

Then there is the class element.I'm sure things may be different in other parts 
of the country,but my GP branch,and others I worked with,were not made up of 
leftists,or ecosocialists.They were elitist upper class,or upper middle class 
liberals,who were unwilling to get out there in the streets,in the streets in 
class struggle solidarity with the poor and working class,and not at all 
interested in providing mutual aid to these struggling classes,the way the 
Panthers did,and the way communist parties all around the US did in the 
1930s,and earlier.This,however,is exactly what the PSL does.

The PSL has also experienced phenominal growth in the years since 2016.I think 
our overtly anti-capitalist message,and the fact we have such a stringent,and 
prolonged membership process may put some people off though.I argue this is a 
good thing.I think we could have been more aggressive as far as getting on the 
ballot in more states,both COVID,and Bernie had a lot to do with this.We don't 
need yet another party to die a tragic death,the way so many left and populist 
parties have.The history of American politics is littered with their 
carcasses,going back to at least the Populist Party of the 1890s,we need to 
build up the strength,and infrastructure of existing independent parties on the 
left,wherever they may be.Reformist paths,like those advocated by many in the 
DSA,are a dead end.It's not for nothing that the Demoocratic Party is called 
thr graveyard of social movements.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#1254): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/1254
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/76628306/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES &amp; NOTES<br />#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when 
replying to a message.<br />#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly &amp; 
permanently archived.<br />#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a 
concern.
-=-=-
Group Owner: marxmail+ow...@groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/1316126222/xyzzy  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to