Best regards,
Andrew Stewart

Begin forwarded message:

> From: H-Net Staff via H-REVIEW <[email protected]>
> Date: March 3, 2021 at 4:13:41 PM EST
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: H-Net Staff <[email protected]>
> Subject: H-Net Review [H-SAWH]:  Soares on Nieves, 'An Architecture of 
> Education: African American Women Design the New South'
> Reply-To: [email protected]
> 
> Angel David Nieves.  An Architecture of Education: African American 
> Women Design the New South.  Gender and Race in American History
> Series. Rochester  University of Rochester Press, 2018.
> Illustrations. 256 pp.  $49.95 (cloth), ISBN 978-1-58046-909-8.
> 
> Reviewed by Leigh Soares (Mississippi State University)
> Published on H-SAWH (March, 2021)
> Commissioned by Katherine E. Rohrer
> 
> In the post-Civil War South, as white Americans sought to shape 
> national memory of the war and slavery, Black Americans promoted a 
> counternarrative that acknowledged the trauma of enslavement and the 
> ongoing struggle for full equality. _An Architecture of Education_, 
> by Angel David Nieves, explores how they inscribed that 
> counternarrative onto the southern landscape by designing Black 
> institutions. Nieves focuses on two Black industrial schools, 
> Voorhees College in South Carolina and Manassas Industrial School in 
> Virginia, established by Black women in the late nineteenth century. 
> He spotlights the respective founders, Elizabeth Evelyn Wright and 
> Jennie Dean, sharing how we might "read" the material culture of 
> their campuses for clues about their race uplift goals. In doing so, 
> Nieves asserts that the institutions themselves became monuments to 
> the intellectual and spatial activism of African American women. 
> 
> _An Architecture of Education _showcases how interdisciplinary 
> methodologies can help scholars overcome the silencing of African 
> American women in traditional documentary archives. Written accounts 
> of Black working-class women's activities in the post-Civil War South 
> are scarce, especially considering the "borderline" literacy of 
> formerly enslaved women like Dean (p. 85). Nieves argues that 
> studying the built environment, therefore, is central to 
> understanding how Black women participated in a larger civic 
> discourse around racialized landscapes in the South. As the author 
> writes, "African American women were purposefully invested in the 
> physical design of their many community-based institutions for racial 
> uplift" (p. 5). Though Wright and Dean lacked architectural training, 
> Nieves casts them as early designers of Black nationalist reform. 
> 
> The first three chapters of the book lay the theoretical groundwork 
> for the central case studies. Nieves demonstrates that Black 
> Americans, who had seen race and design comingle in the public sphere 
> during campaigns to build Civil War monuments and the 1893 Columbian 
> Exposition, understood the power of shaping the built environment. 
> Nieves argues that Black Americans appropriated dominant 
> architectural styles when building institutions to challenge 
> prevailing Lost Cause narratives and inscribe their own contributions 
> onto the southern landscape. 
> 
> Within these early chapters, Nieves effectively links institution 
> building to Black nationalist reform. He differentiates between the 
> "public transcript" and "hidden transcript" produced by Black 
> institutions interested in advancing Black economic and political 
> self-determination (p. 28). Chapter 3 applies this framework to the 
> example of Tuskegee Institute in Alabama. Based on his analysis of 
> how Booker T. Washington designed the curriculum, main campus, and 
> adjacent planned community, Nieves argues that underneath the 
> institution's façade of assimilation lay "a formal challenge to the 
> accepted social norms of segregation, racism, and mass public 
> lynchings" (p. 63). The book therefore adds to scholarship that 
> reinterprets Washington and industrial education not as 
> accommodationist but rather as embedded in Black political activism. 
> 
> Chapter 4 introduces the two women at the center of this story. 
> Wright and Dean represent how Black women helped reshape the southern 
> landscape and uplift Black communities through institution building. 
> Wright, an alumnus of Tuskegee herself, benefited from formal 
> education and a relationship with the Washington family that helped 
> open doors for her when she set out to build Voorhees. By contrast, 
> Dean, a formerly enslaved woman, was less literate and had fewer 
> professional connections. Nieves creatively speculates about how we 
> might fill in some of the gaps in her personal story. Then, he uses 
> the spare written records that do exist to show that the curriculum 
> at Dean's school cultivated racial pride among its Black students in 
> the early Jim Crow era. That Manassas Industrial School emphasized 
> teaching Black history and Black literature in addition to mechanical 
> trades reinforces the author's claim that Black Americans believed 
> industrial schools were an important part of nation making. 
> 
> The book reaches its crescendo in chapter 5, where it examines 
> specific design elements of Tuskegee, Voorhees College, and Manassas 
> Industrial School. The analysis is supported by an extensive inset of 
> photographs, drawings, and architectural descriptions. Nieves argues 
> that the campuses reveal their founders' vision for independent Black 
> communities. Here Nieves effectively situates Wright and Dean in a 
> network of architects, designers, and donors. Wright, in particular, 
> drew on her Tuskegee connections to collaborate with Black 
> architects, including Robert Taylor, William Sidney Pittman, and 
> William Wilson Cooke, as well as the students who applied skills 
> learned in their industrial classes to help construct campus 
> buildings. The chapter succeeds in feeling like the culmination of a 
> compelling story about how we can understand these institutions as 
> "living monuments" to their founders and to Black uplift (p. 105). 
> 
> Some questions, however, remain unanswered. Unlike Voorhees, Manassas 
> underwent a kind of top-down design from a northern white architect. 
> How might that have affected Dean's ability to direct the campus 
> design? Given the sex-segregated industrial classes that were typical 
> for institutions of the era, to what extent can we imagine Voorhees 
> and Manassas reflected the design vision of not just their respective 
> founders but also women on the faculty or among the student body? The 
> subtitle of _An Architecture of Education_ may provoke expectations
> to see Black women in action throughout the book, but readers will be 
> more satisfied if they know the book is primarily concerned with how 
> Black institutions contain a hidden transcript of Black nationalist 
> reform. 
> 
> With _An Architecture of Education_, Nieves adds to conversations 
> taking place in academic and public spaces about how the history of 
> slavery and its afterlives is implicated in monument making and 
> institution building, especially on school campuses. Nieves inserts 
> historically Black institutions and their founders into the 
> discourse, revealing how late nineteenth-century Black reformers 
> inscribed their own narratives onto the built environment. Readers 
> interested in African American intellectual history, educational 
> history, and the history of architecture will welcome this concise 
> analysis of the contest over racialized landscapes in the "New 
> South." 
> 
> Citation: Leigh Soares. Review of Nieves, Angel David, _An 
> Architecture of Education: African American Women Design the New 
> South_. H-SAWH, H-Net Reviews. March, 2021.
> URL: https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=55763
> 
> This work is licensed under a Creative Commons 
> Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States 
> License.
> 
> 


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#6948): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/6948
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/81066552/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES &amp; NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly &amp; permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/21656/1316126222/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to