Chris Slee said:

The US economic blockade against Cuba makes Cuba dependent on trade with Russia 
and China.  This inevitably has an influence on Cuba's foreign policy.  Cuba 
will be very cautious about doing or saying anything which might annoy Russia 
or China, which might cause the latter to cut off trade and further deepen 
Cuba's economic problems.

Only if the US blockade is ended will Cuba be free to adopt a consistently 
progressive foreign policy.

The US left should be campaigning vigorously against the blockades on Cuba and 
Venezuela, but as far as I can tell from a distance this does not appear to be 
the case.

* * * * * * * *

Ken Hiebert replies:

I’m inclined to agree with Chris.  At one time Cuba was very dependent on the 
USSR.  I don’t know the nature of the relationship today with Russia and China, 
but I expect they must be dependent to some degree.
In that situation they are not necessarily bound to slavishly follow the 
foreign policy of Russia and China, but it is something they must take into 
account.

Chris says,   "The US left should be campaigning vigorously against the 
blockades on Cuba and Venezuela, but as far as I can tell from a distance this 
does not appear to be the case.”
I think the depends on how you define the left.  The various organized Marxist 
currents are doing some work, but in my view they are not as effective as they 
could be.  And I think this is true in Canada as well.
Considering the broad sympathy for Cuba, the movement against the blockade 
should be broader.  But I’m not sure that any of the leaders of this movement 
have the perspective and political skills to bring together a broad movement.

I look back at the work that was done in Canada in the early years of the 
revolution and I believe it was effective.  I cite the work in my own province, 
British Columbia.
Aside from Jack Scott, a columnist in the Vancouver Sun, the campaign drew in 
Cedric Cox, an MLA (equivalent to a state legislator), and Colin Cameron, an MP 
at the federal level.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cedric_Cox


Colin Cameron
https://www.lipad.ca/members/record/97f9d88f-ae28-4f99-8f6c-2ec41c4accfa/2/
I have a very clear recollection of the day in this house when it looked as 
though we were coming to the end of things. I refer, of course, to the 
confrontation over Cuba. I have been interested to note in all my reading of 
the discussions on the matter that no one goes farther back than the situation 
that obtained after Fidel Castro succeeded in seizing power in Cuba. No one 
goes farther back in history where there are another few links in the chain of 
cause and effect which finally led us that day in the House of Commons to sit 
here wondering whether we were facing the end of all things. If people would go 
farther back they would find something else that Canada and other prosperous 
parts of the world should not be very proud of, namely, that for decades we had 
known that the Cuban people were suffering under one of the most brutal 
dictatorships in the history of the world. They were living in poverty, in 
misery and in fear, and we did nothing about it. As a consequence the chain of 
events led finally to the confrontation between the two great powers in the 
world.

I suggest that if we are interested in our own defence we should be bending all 
our efforts to coping with all the potential Cubas that exist throughout the 
world which may at any time produce the chain of cause and effect that will 
lead us to the brink of disaster. I can think of no more honourable, no more 
decisive and significant role for Canada at this time than to say to the rest 
of the world that we are not interested in this fatal game of military 
expenditures and military defiance because we know we can play no real role in 
it. We should say that we want to free our hands to undertake the task that 
lies ahead of all of us in the more affluent parts of the world, which is to 
remove to the best of our ability the causes of future disruption of peace in 
the world by removing the poverty and misery underlying those causes. But if we 
are going to go on playing, which is all we are doing-posturing, playing and 
pretending-that we in Canada can play any sort of role whatsoever in the 
military sense we are not going to have the resources, the energies and the 
time to engage in the real peace keeping operation of trying to build up the 
submerged areas of the world to the level of affluence that we enjoy on this 
continent.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#7191): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/7191
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/81252823/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/21656/1316126222/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to