<<Charlie wrote:

<<This calculation is not correct.>>

S.Artesian replies:

Charles Andrews misses the whole point,and therefore cannot provide any 
calculations of his own--relying on the fact that prices
are not always or necessarily values in Marx's critique, ignoring of course 
that a) aggregate prices (total prices) always equal aggregate value  b) prices 
represent the phenomenal expression of value and express not  just the 
relations of commodities to each other, but the movement of capital.

Charlie is ideologically correct, maybe, but that's its own criticism, which 
proves by refusing to provide any method or data for conducting a different 
calculation

My point in the presentation of the costs of petroleum production was to show 
how miniscule the cost of labor is in the production process and the 
reproduction of capital.  The point about relative reproduction times of the 
wage in relation to the price per barrel is NOT that the amount of relative 
surplus value changes but rather that the revenue accruing to the petroleum 
sector increases and, all else remaining equal, the resulting reduction in the 
time of wage recuperation must involve the transfer of revenues from other 
sectors of capitalist production to the petroleum sector.

Back in 2013, I did more detailed calculations using data from the US Annual 
Survey of Manufacturers and the
QFR (JAI: Quarterly Financial Report) :

( https://thewolfatthedoor. blogspot.com/2013/08/ smoothand-by-numbers-3.html ( 
https://thewolfatthedoor.blogspot.com/2013/08/smoothand-by-numbers-3.html )

https://thewolfatthedoor. blogspot.com/2013/11/food- 
machinery-and-chemicals.html ( 
https://thewolfatthedoor.blogspot.com/2013/11/food-machinery-and-chemicals.html 
)

The calculations of course are approximations but over time a definite trend 
can be detected-- and that "trend" was that while the petroleum industry 
demonstrated a ratio of C capital  to V capital about 5 times greater than the 
manufacturing sector as a whole, its ratio of profit to C-- its rate of 
profit-- was less than half that of the manufacturing sector.

The fluctuations in oil price were, and are, an attempt of the petroleum sector 
to achieve that general rate of profit, which leads it always into 
overproduction.


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#29701): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/29701
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/105114020/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
#4 Do not exceed five posts a day.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/21656/1316126222/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to