Malik adds to the now huge mountain of facts that support a criminal indictment of Boeing executives ... in a court of a workers' dictatorship.
There are also a defect of reasoning and a shortcoming. * "Mechanics always place safety first since they and their families fly the same aircraft they service." Don't Boeing executives fly on these aircraft, too? * The conclusion is simply, "more power must be given to the workers who assemble, maintain and fix the planes." Why is such a weak concept put forward just at the point where socialists raise the question, how much can reform short of socialism accomplish? Another article ( https://newworker.us/domestic/airliners-fall-apart-in-the-sky-what-is-a-communist-solution/ ) on unsafe airliners (by me) proceeded, "Capitalist firms exist to make a profit. According to the evidence, the profit drive is why design problems are overlooked, why cheaper cost outranks safety, why tests and inspections are corrupted – in short, why airlines fill risky airplanes with passengers and take them aloft." So look at a communist solution, which is then specified. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#29883): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/29883 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/105493841/21656 -=-=- POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. #4 Do not exceed five posts a day. -=-=- Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/21656/1316126222/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
