Kristin: (1) Your comments earlier about a year ago (?) - were not ignored as you claimed. You had no rebuttal against the charge that this was not substantiated as anything other than immigrant bashing. (2) Now you again re-hash the whole thing from the far right spectrum. For those not in the UK, they may not know this individual. However even wikipedia has an exposure of this Rupert Lowe -> See this from Wikipedia -> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rupert_Lowe ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rupert_Lowe ) -> “… In January 2025, the American businessman Elon Musk, who had endorsed Reform UK, called on Nigel Farage to resign as leader, and then praised Lowe.[56][57] Lowe thanked Musk, but reiterated his support for Farage.[58] The dispute between Musk and Farage stemmed from Musk's endorsement of political activist Tommy Robinson, whom Farage has rejected; Lowe said Robinson should be acknowledged for "exposing these [child rape] gangs" but called him "not right for Reform".[58]
On 8 January 2025, Lowe brought in a Ten Minute Rule Bill to ban quantitative easing, praising Argentinian president Javier Milei and looking forward to Musk working with American president Donald Trump, before saying "The cost of government should be covered by taxes alone, limiting the growth of excessive statism" which he said was linked to "a general moral decline in society...". (3) Nick Lowles has looked at this “report” carefully -> https://nicklowles.substack.com/p/we-ignore-rupert-lowes-gang-rape -> “ Title : We ignore Rupert Lowe’s Gang Rape Inquiry report at our peril Subtitle : It might be based on clear falsehoods and have used dodgy and carefully-curated data to support a fervent anti-Muslim narrative, but Lowe’s report will be believed by millions…." “… Lowe’s report is indeed startling, but it is full of inaccuracies and fails to stand up to rigorous scrutiny. Unsurprisingly, he has allowed his rabid anti-immigration agenda to distort his argument. His report is more polemic than a balanced document and, because of this, he has sacrificed validity and authority in favour of sensationalism. Facts are well-concealed amidst biased opinion, speculation, inappropriate extrapolation, false equivalence, meaningless correlations and tedious repetition. What shines through, above all, is that the child victims have been cynically used to prove a point. His agenda is primarily race, not rape." Would you rebut this counter-report Kristin? Hari -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#42133): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/42133 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/119887039/21656 -=-=- POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. #4 Do not exceed five posts a day. -=-=- Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/13617172/21656/1316126222/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
