As part of Spectre’s ongoing discussion regarding how the Left can think the 
conjuncture in Venezuela given recent US intervention and the dynamics of the 
Venezuelan state, here Spectre editors Shireen Akram-Boshar and Charlie Post 
interview Federico Fuentes. Federico is a longtime Venezuela solidarity 
activist who lived in Caracas for several years during the Hugo Chávez 
government as a correspondent for Green Left and investigator at the Centro 
Internacional Miranda. He is co-author of Latin America’s Turbulent 
Transitions: The Future of Twenty-First Century Socialism and editor of LINKS 
International Journal of Socialist Renewal, which has hosted a discussion on 
Maduro’s Venezuela primarily with articles by and interviews with Venezuelan 
leftists. For our earlier coverage see Spectre editor Maga Miranda’s interview 
with Geo Maher, “The US Kidnapping of Nicolás Maduro,” and Manuel Cassique 
Herrera’s response, “Communes and Crises.”

*On January 3, 2026, the US military kidnapped Venezuelan President Nicolas 
Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores in a raid at his compound, while bombing 
military sites across northern Venezuela. They were flown to a detention center 
in New York, and charged with “narco-terrorism” and drug trafficking. Can you 
start with how you would characterize this current moment and the dangers posed 
to Venezuela by the Trump administration?*

The January 3 US military assault, which also led to the deaths of more than 
one hundred Venezuelan and Cuban civilians and security personnel, represents a 
grave attack on sovereignty, peace and democratic rights—and not just for 
Venezuela. The events since have only confirmed these actions had nothing to do 
with narcotrafficking or democracy and everything to do with reasserting US 
dominance in Venezuela and Latin America more broadly.

Six months on, Venezuela is essentially a twenty-first century US protectorate 
in the heart of Latin America. Today, the United States economically and 
politically controls Venezuela, having placed the country under coercive 
tutelage and neocolonial administration. The United States has seized control 
of the country’s oil exports and revenue, opened other strategic sectors (such 
as mining and electricity) to US corporations, carried out a geopolitical 
realignment (or “outward regime change”) of the country’s foreign policy, and 
enacted a further military strike on Venezuelan soil, this time with support 
from Venezuela’s government.

It is difficult to understate the gravity of what is occurring right now in 
Venezuela or the chilling precedent it sets for the region. Therefore, it is 
important not just to characterize the current moment but understand why and 
how this came about. This requires situating January 3 both within the broader 
context of more than two decades of US imperialist hostility towards the 
Venezuelan government as well as more recent developments; namely, the US 
foreign policy shift under Trump, and the collapse in support for the Maduro 
government.

US foreign policy has undergone a profound shift under Trump. As outlined in 
the White House’s National Security Strategy, Trump seeks “to restore American 
preeminence in the Western Hemisphere” by securing control over key territories 
and vital resources. The Trump administration aims to impose full spectrum 
dominance across the region via military means (as seen in Venezuela), economic 
means (tariffs, naval blockades, and so on) and political means (open 
intervention in elections, support for far right parties, and so on).

After initially negotiating with the Maduro government, Trump assessed that 
removing him from power offered a perfect platform from which to launch his new 
security strategy. Venezuelan sociologist Malfred Gerig explains: 
Ideologically, it offer[ed] the defeat of socialism, notwithstanding Maduro’s 
regime being socialist in name only. Militarily, it offer[ed] a demonstration 
of firepower and persuasion. Geopolitically, it [wa]s a power move at the table 
of great powers, something Washington was eager for. Economically, it offer[ed] 
a substantial oil windfall for the US state and the corporations that financed 
Trump’s campaigns.

Having removed Maduro, Trump plans to use Venezuela as a pivot from which to 
expand this policy across the region.

That’s the why behind January 3. As for how this was possible, we have to 
understand that the Maduro government was extremely fragile, offering Trump an 
easy victory at little cost. The Maduro government was heavily weakened by the 
2024 presidential elections, when it refused to publish results verifying its 
asserted victory—strongly indicating that fraud had been committed. This, 
combined with the harsh repression meted out against traditionally pro Chavista 
working class neighborhoods, dramatically exposed the government’s loss of 
support and lack of legitimacy, domestically and internationally.

The 2024 elections and its aftermath showed the lengths to which the Maduro 
regime was willing to go to maintain control, choosing to crush its own support 
base rather than relinquish power. At the same time, it also demonstrated the 
weakness of the traditional right-wing opposition, which was unable to turn its 
electoral majority into a movement that could truly challenge the government.

As a result, the Trump administration concluded that any new government—whoever 
led it—would be highly dependent on the United States and more than willing to 
go along with its plans in return for maintaining power. US imperialism today 
deals with the new Delcy Rodríguez government on a fundamentally new footing: 
one in which all the cards are in Trump’s hands. Trump uses this to humiliate 
the government by forcing it to administer the protectorate and carry out 
policies that the US has for a long time envisaged for Venezuela, in the 
process crushing what remains of the government’s social base.

Continue reading at 
https://spectrejournal.com/on-us-intervention-and-the-venezuelan-state/


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#42540): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/42540
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/120341041/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
#4 Do not exceed five posts a day.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/13617172/21656/1316126222/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to