Not sure what people are getting at here. When Louis was alive I witnessed how much he attempted to have substantive engagements with everyone. Two things can be true at one time. Louis did seem to have a bit of a temper so when conversations devolved into vitriol he was quick to take action. Always thought he was setting the tone for what moderation should look like. Over the years I had some substantive disagreements and I was never banned until I loss access to my email account and was likely removed for inactivity. I do remember the New York Times movie review article times but I never associated that move with a retaliatory maneuver against his detractor’s I saw it as an attempt to bridge the gap between otherwise mutually exclusive interest. I was a young dumb college kid so maybe I missed something that others were able to pick up on.
Cheers, Ben -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#42968): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/42968 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/120713292/21656 -=-=- POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. #4 Do not exceed five posts a day. -=-=- Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/13617172/21656/1316126222/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
