Bukharin in the late 1920s, with his characterization of a third period, tacks to the left on his assessment of sentiment among the working masses outside the Soviet Union. But Bukharin tacks right on the peasant question, advocating sweetness for the kulaks.
Whatever his merit as a philosopher or political economist, Bukharin is a miserable political strategist. Some will say it is merely a limit of his capabilities. Others will tie it to his joining covert groups trying to overthrow the Soviet regime. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#43501): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/43501 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/121384011/21656 -=-=- POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. #4 Do not exceed five posts a day. -=-=- Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/13617172/21656/1316126222/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
