My point was that the article is about Zionists claiming the NYT is not
Zionist enough. Not that we should not take notice of what the NYT or other
establishment media say. It's vital that we are aware of what the 'msm' are
saying. And yes, I did notice that Trump had banned some pretty mainstream
news organisations for not being meek enough. That is news and I have said
as much in conversation here, but I'm not in the US, so nonpartisan of that
discussion. I think the point of that post being added here is because the
poster sympathises with the case being taken, as some from the
Barnes/Militant tradition probably do. I may be mistaken of course.

What was news to us in that story?

That Zionists want the paper to be more pro-Zionist? Isn't that "Dog bites
man", as Louis was wont to say?

That some Zionists are suing the paper? It will be news if they win against
the paper. But I doubt that will happen.

Comradely,
John


"All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks."
Sarah Moore Grimke, abolitionist (1792-1873)


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#43527): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/43527
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/121397562/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
#4 Do not exceed five posts a day.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/13617172/21656/1316126222/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to