I like the concept of having some utility js functions. May be we drop them into some common directory where all mashups have access to. If we have that in place we can ship more utility js libraries.
Thanks, Keith. Jonathan Marsh wrote: > The latest stubs include extensions to the Date object to parse and > serialize xs:date, xs:time, and xs:dateTime types. I implemented these as > extension methods for convenient, because these methods can be used by any > stub user (they're not just internal). > > > > However I don't think extending build-in objects is viewed as a good > practice - for instance it could conflict with other JS libraries. > > > > What do you think? Should I reformulate these are util methods of some > kind? Hide them from the public? Or is the current state good enough? > > > > Jonathan Marsh - <http://www.wso2.com> http://www.wso2.com - > <http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Mashup-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mashup-dev _______________________________________________ Mashup-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mashup-dev
