These functions are required by the stub, so I don't want them in a separate file where one can forget to include them.
Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Keith Chapman > Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 9:31 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [mashup-dev] Extending Date prototype > > I like the concept of having some utility js functions. May be we drop > them into some common directory where all mashups have access to. If we > have that in place we can ship more utility js libraries. > > Thanks, > Keith. > > Jonathan Marsh wrote: > > The latest stubs include extensions to the Date object to parse and > > serialize xs:date, xs:time, and xs:dateTime types. I implemented > these as > > extension methods for convenient, because these methods can be used > by any > > stub user (they're not just internal). > > > > > > > > However I don't think extending build-in objects is viewed as a good > > practice - for instance it could conflict with other JS libraries. > > > > > > > > What do you think? Should I reformulate these are util methods of > some > > kind? Hide them from the public? Or is the current state good > enough? > > > > > > > > Jonathan Marsh - <http://www.wso2.com> http://www.wso2.com - > > <http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com> > http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Mashup-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mashup-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Mashup-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mashup-dev _______________________________________________ Mashup-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mashup-dev
