On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 02:44:02AM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Aug 2006, Gavin Carr wrote:
> 
> >>><% $m->call_next %>
> >>^ adds an extra "\n", instead you could use:
> >>% $m->call_next;
> >
> >OK. Happy to save one extra "\n".
> 
> I think this is a legitimate criticism. The <% %> tag says evaluates the 
> expression and inlines the result in the text. This makes no sense when 
> calling another component, since the _result_ of evaluating that 
> expression is nothing. Using substitution where you just want Perl is 
> a confusing style.

Fair enough - corrected.

Thanks,
Gavin


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Mason-users mailing list
Mason-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mason-users

Reply via email to