On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Hans Dieter Pearcey wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 09:12:32AM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote: >> I think the Template namespace has been more or less claimed by TT, >> unfortunately. I wouldn't object to leaving the framework pieces under >> HTML::Mason, however. > > Not really. There are several dists with modules under Template:: that > aren't TT: > * Template-TAL > * Template-Declare > * Template-Simple > (there are more, but three in the last year or so is enough to make my point)
Ah, that's good to know. I still like the idea of a Mason top-level space, mostly for vanity purposes. Mason has a lot of name recognition, so I think that justifies Mason::Template. -dave /*=================================================== VegGuide.Org www.BookIRead.com Your guide to all that's veg. My book blog ===================================================*/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Mason-users mailing list Mason-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mason-users
