>>> AFAIK components don't equal subs directly, so doing @q = >>> $m->comp('foo') >>> isn't the same as @q = foo(); >> >>Actually, that should be equivalent. > > > Absolutely. > > In fact calling $m->comp('SELF:want) from within a perl block does > the right thing, that is does not make Perl think that wantarray is > in effect. > > It's only <% $m->comp('foo') %> where things go awry. > > > The bug appears to be in how $m->print works. But I don't really get > the whole stack/buffer thing.
i for one appreciate that <% %> is in list context (wantarray), which makes perfect sense since it is essentially a print statement, and args to print() are always in list context. i find it more odd that <& &> and %$m->comp() have wantarray defined (though at least it is false!) when they are apparently in void context. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Mason-users mailing list Mason-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mason-users