On 06/29/2009 11:44:14 AM, Paul Vixie wrote: > nice job. Thanks all! I've recieved a few replies now and they all seem positive, so I guess I didn't screw anything up too badly. As I said, there's not that much to go by and I don't want to inadvertanly spread my inadvertant bad habits to others.
Vis. "mason vs. catalyst", the reason I haven't looked at catalyst is that I learned the MVC model via Ruby on Rails. MVC is a good concept and RonR is very clever, but I wanted to see if I could accomplish what I want with an awareness of the framework possibilities, but not necessarily having to deal with a generic frameworking system. Does that make sense? In any case, it's nice to hear that other people have made a go of it that way on a major scale. Someone's tip to keep the code in modules and not in components is probably a good one. Maybe I will add an emphasis to that idea in the tutorial. So thanks again! MK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Mason-users mailing list Mason-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mason-users
