On Sat, 4 Jul 2009, Paul Vixie wrote:

> Dave Rolsky <auta...@urth.org> writes:
>
>> ..., I do think that using some sort of controller is pretty crucial to
>> having a maintainable webapp, and using Mason as your controller is not a
>> good idea.
>
> i graduated from raw mod-perl2 and 'use CGI' to mason last year, and am
> loving it so far.  my gripe with the MVC approach is that it requires
> more discipline than i have and more foreknowledge than i ever have about
> exactly what i'm building and when i'll be done.

I don't really understand this sentiment. MVC code is still code, and code 
is quite malleable.

The point of MVC is not to impose some big design up front methodology, it 
simply lets you organize your code in a cleaner way as you go.


-dave

/*============================================================
http://VegGuide.org               http://blog.urth.org
Your guide to all that's veg      House Absolute(ly Pointless)
============================================================*/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Mason-users mailing list
Mason-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mason-users

Reply via email to