Hi,
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Allan Engelhardt <all...@cybaea.com>wrote:
> For Mason 2, Mason::Compilation implements %% lines which do not appear to
> be documented in Mason::Manual::Syntax. They whack the rest of the line
> into the class header (_add_to_class_block) as opposed to the current
> method. Is it “safe” to use these lines, for a definition of safe that
> roughly means ‘this functionality is unlikely to go away in the future’ or
> should I just code my components properly and stop hacking around?
I'm really not sure… I never used that, and didn't noticed that it was
possible.
what's the benefit over placing your code inside <%class></%class>?
Bye,
--
Pedro Melo
@pedromelo
http://www.simplicidade.org/
http://about.me/melo
xmpp:m...@simplicidade.org
mailto:m...@simplicidade.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnnow-d2d
_______________________________________________
Mason-users mailing list
Mason-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mason-users
