On 22 January 2013 14:48, Pedro Melo <m...@simplicidade.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Allan Engelhardt <all...@cybaea.com>wrote:
>
>> For Mason 2, Mason::Compilation implements %% lines which do not appear
>> to be documented in Mason::Manual::Syntax. They whack the rest of the line
>> into the class header (_add_to_class_block) as opposed to the current
>> method. Is it “safe” to use these lines, for a definition of safe that
>> roughly means ‘this functionality is unlikely to go away in the future’ or
>> should I just code my components properly and stop hacking around?
>
>
> I'm really not sure… I never used that, and didn't noticed that it was
> possible.
>
As I said: not really documented. I was working on a way to disable the
processing of '%' lines when I first came across it.
> what's the benefit over placing your code inside <%class></%class>?
>
Only for hacks. The class section is The Right Place for it. But I have
some code that I haven't yet figured out how to factor out so for the
moment I am doing the old cut-and-paste. For that it is convenient to have
everything in one section and not having to paste some into class and other
into the main component sections.
(But then I am also modifying $$_m_buffer directly from the component so
what do you expect…? :) )
Allan
>
> Bye,
> --
> Pedro Melo
> @pedromelo
> http://www.simplicidade.org/
> http://about.me/melo
> xmpp:m...@simplicidade.org
> mailto:m...@simplicidade.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnnow-d2d
_______________________________________________
Mason-users mailing list
Mason-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mason-users
