/* HINT: Search archives @ http://www.indyramp.com/masq/ before posting!
/* ALSO: Don't quote this header. It makes you look lame :-) */
I would recommend trying LeechFTP - it is a free FTP client for
win95/98/nt/2000, and download speeds tend to be better than using WS_FTP,
anyway. You can get it @ http://tucows.gj.net & it's in the FTP section.
Long Live Linux!
-Ken
----- Original Message -----
From: "Anurag Jalan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2000 12:48 PM
Subject: [Masq] Masqed FTP is slowwwww
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've finally found a Win98 FTP client that works on my Masqueraded network
> .. FTP Voyager. But the throuput is painfully slow ( about 500 cps ) on an
> average ..when i have a 64kbps ISDN link .( From a standalone machine on
> 33.6k modem PPP .. i get 1500 cps at least )
>
> FTP Voyager allows several adjustments in connection properties : Receive
> and send timeouts ( 61-600 seconds ), send / receive buffers ( 512-65536
> bytes ) , Active & passive modes ...
>
> What might help ?
>
> i) kernel upgrade from 2.2.14 to 2.2.16 ( I run Redhat 6.2 & SuSe 6.4 )
>
> ii) Ethernet card config ?
>
> iii ) Any other suggestions ?
>
> Regards
>
> Anurag
>
> -----From a post on a MASQ LIST ----------
> >I had a couple configuration problems, with one or more of them causing
the
> >slowdown. First, I upgraded the kernel to 2.2.14, since www.kernel.org
> >listed "MASQ bug fixes" as one of the updates. This didn't help any, so
I
> >continued searching. I updated several things at once, and on the next
> >reboot, it all worked OK. Here's the old configuration vs new config:
> >
> >DLink DE-220 ISA combo card as eth0 (external interface)
> > Full duplex changed to half duplex (saw it on D. Ranch's forum)
> > IRQ10 remained the same
> >DLink DE-220 ISA ...as eth1 (internal interface)
> > Full duplex changed to half duplex
> > IRQ3 changed to IRQ12 (eliminated the possible conflict with COM2 port)
> >Internal newtwork addresses
> > 192.168.1.x changed to 192.168.0.x - although 192.168.1.x is a valid
> >class-c, I was getting some odd pings so I changed it.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Masq maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Admin requests can be handled at http://www.indyramp.com/masq-list/ --
> THIS INCLUDES UNSUBSCRIBING!
> or email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> PLEASE read the HOWTO and search the archives before posting.
> You can start your search at http://www.indyramp.com/masq/
> Please keep general linux/unix/pc/internet questions off the list.
_______________________________________________
Masq maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Admin requests can be handled at http://www.indyramp.com/masq-list/ --
THIS INCLUDES UNSUBSCRIBING!
or email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PLEASE read the HOWTO and search the archives before posting.
You can start your search at http://www.indyramp.com/masq/
Please keep general linux/unix/pc/internet questions off the list.
