David Jirku <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > So, using the masq accounting rules is the only way I can think of
> > to get byte counts in a 2.0 kernel.
>
> The problem is that this is system wide, so it is hard to get byte
> counters per interface on a box with more than one (non-loopback)
> interface.
Hmm, can't you tailor the accounting rules to match on a per-interface
basis? That is, create multiple accounting rules, each with its own
"-W" argument so that it only accounts for traffic on that interface?
Seems do-able to me. :)
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fuzzy Fox) || "Nothing takes the taste out of peanut
sometimes known as David DeSimone || butter quite like unrequited love."
http://www.dallas.net/~fox/ || -- Charlie Brown
_______________________________________________
Masq maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tiffany.indyramp.com/mailman/listinfo/masq
Admin requests can be handled by web (above) or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
