>I don't know of any way to convince an rlogind to accept a connection on
>a non-root (>1024) port. Seems like you would need to use some sort of
>proxy, to send the traffic through on a low port, without the
>masquerade.
>
>Hey, I bet transparent-proxy could do it! I did a very similar thing
>that sends connections through a SOCKS-server. I bet the same could be
>done for rsh/rlogin/rexec traffic. Sounds like fun. I think I'll work
>on it. :)
One thing though.. what about SSH? Obviously SSH can replace Rsh, etc
but can it do it via > 1024 ports?
--David
.----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
| David A. Ranch - Linux/Networking/PC hardware [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
!---- ----!
`----- For more detailed info, see http://www.ecst.csuchico.edu/~dranch -----'
_______________________________________________
Masq maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tiffany.indyramp.com/mailman/listinfo/masq
Admin requests can be handled by web (above) or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
