At 08:23 PM 2/25/1999 -0600, Fuzzy Fox wrote:
>> One thing though.. what about SSH? Obviously SSH can replace Rsh, etc
>> but can it do it via > 1024 ports?
>
>As far as I know, ssh has no requirement that the source port be < 1024,
>so it should masq just fine.
SSH works perfectly. It also has the added benefit of being able to tunnel X!
Sean
------------------------------------------------------------
Sean Walberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.escape.ca/~sean
PGP (RSA & DSS) on keyservers ICQ: 762966
_______________________________________________
Masq maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tiffany.indyramp.com/mailman/listinfo/masq
Admin requests can be handled by web (above) or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
