/* HINT: Search archives @ http://www.indyramp.com/masq/ before posting! */
>>>>> "FF" == Fuzzy Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
FF> However, standard URL lookups and proxied URL lookups use a different
FF> syntax. By default, I believe Squid will not understand the syntax
FF> difference, unless you tell it to look for transparent-proxied
FF> requests. You will need to read the Squid documentation, as I don't
FF> have the answer for you. But I suggest your problem is probably with
FF> squid, since your ipchains rule looks correct. The only way I can
FF> see it fail is if you have some other rule that generates an "ACCEPT"
FF> target before the "REDIRECT" has a chance to take effect. But I
FF> doubt that.
Actually, that was EXACTLY my problem. My REDIRECT statement followed an
ACCEPT statement that acccepted all packets on the internal interface that
were sourced by my internal system. I moved the REDIRECT so that it was the
first rule and now squid is seeing my packets. Of course now I have to
figure out why squid is not doing proper DNS resolution...
Thanks!
--
Jake Colman
Principia Partners LLC Phone: (201) 946-0300
Harborside Financial Center Fax: (201) 946-0320
902 Plaza II Beeper: (800) 928-4640
Jersey City, NJ 07311 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://www.ppllc.com
"Every time I think I've idiot-proofed something someone comes up with a
better idiot"
_______________________________________________
Masq maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Admin requests can be handled at http://www.indyramp.com/masq-list/ -- THIS INCLUDES
UNSUBSCRIBING!
or email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PLEASE read the HOWTO and search the archives before posting.
You can start your search at http://www.indyramp.com/masq/
Please keep general linux/unix/pc/internet questions off the list.
