>I realize this isn't coded yet, but I think it might be something to
>consider, if it isn't too hard. Just be able to feed it the interfaces to
>balance on, and a weight for each protocol/port. Maybe add in a protocol or
>two that are only allowed on a certain interface (maybe to take care of the
>ftp problem), and away you go.
Well, to be honest, IPFWADM is offically dead in support of IPCHAINS.
Also, though the bonding of multiple 10 or 100BaseT connections is
cool, there really isn't that much need for it (yes atleast). Maybe
in the future this will be addressed but I doubt it would be done
at the IPCHAINS level. I would imagine it would be a kernel-level
issue.
--David
.----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
| David A. Ranch - Linux/Networking/PC hardware [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
!---- ----!
`----- For more detailed info, see http://www.ecst.csuchico.edu/~dranch -----'
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For daily digest info, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
