On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 01:08:31AM +0100, Jehan wrote:

> This is similar to what was writing Gary Zhang. I will fix this later on.
> Do you think we should keep the option -xftsz, and then for instance if
> you have several fonts, we can accept several size as well, their order
> corresponding to the font orders?
> 
> Or as was suggesting Gary, maybe adding the font size to the font name
> directly is better? I think this last solution as some sexy way of
> doing...

If we have multiple fonts then I think putting the size directly in the
name would be better. It breaks backward compatibility, but oh well...

>> 3. Resizing when the multi-char font is used causes a segfault.
> 
> Ok, the multi-char font (-xftfm, is it well what you are speaking
> about?) does not exist anymore! Everything is now done with the fonts
> in the -xftfn list. Probably there are still some places where this
> option is still mentionned, so when you try and use it, it
> segfaults?.. What made you say 'multi-char font is used' anyway?

No no, not the xftfm. I meant with with multiple xft fonts specified in
xftfn.

Some coming up,

GI

-- 
'Dummy' -- Sit in the tunnel and wait for the light to come to you!

Attachment: pgpiLDxEc1hdl.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Materm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/materm-devel
mrxvt home page: http://materm.sourceforge.net

Reply via email to