>>> "EL" == Eric Ludlam <ericlud...@gmail.com> writes:

> On 11/29/20 10:45 AM, Uwe Brauer wrote:
>>>>> "EL" == Eric Ludlam <ericlud...@gmail.com> writes:
>>> Hi Uwe,
>>> There are a bunch of old misc fixes over in the usage1 branch that we
>>> should probably merge into master.  The save-and-go work I was doing
>>> never became as robust as I wanted, but it should be transparent if no
>>> one tries to activate the feature.  It also includes my patch for
>>> completion I posted yesterday.
>>> Doing the merge will let us retire usage1.
>> 
>> The last commit on that branch seems to be
>> c22998376b623f79b196cc30273d1ae5c8218e16
>> which is of today.
>> I merge that one into master, ok?
>> 
> Yes, I put in some patches from John into usage1 that fixes some
> hangs, and also a first cut at a piece of the completion using the
> shell patch I posted a bit earlier.

> We've been using a majority of those patches deployed at MW for a
> while, so they should be good to go.  If the completion bit seems too
> risky, feel free to leave it out.

I compiled, is it ok to test it for one day before pushing?

Is there anything specific I should test? Sorry I did not pay too much
attention to the completion issue as I should have.

Uwe 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Matlab-emacs-discuss mailing list
Matlab-emacs-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matlab-emacs-discuss

Reply via email to