John Hunter wrote: > On Nov 9, 2007 1:12 PM, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I've committed my changes on the transforms branch so you can play with >> it -- I'm holding off on changing the trunk due to the pending release. >> But if everyone agrees on the way to expose this, it would be nice to >> merge this over to trunk before the release. > > Am I right in assuming that the only thing we lose in this approach is > faceting (which Eric hates but others may care about)? Since it is
John, I agree that others may want faceting, but I have not yet heard from anyone who does. When I proposed making "flat" the default I got only positive comments, and there have been no complaints about the change. > orders of magnitudes faster, we could have a pcolor_faceted which > pcolor calls the old function if shading='faceted'. Of course the two > functions would return different types (image vs patch collection) > which is potentially a bit confusing.... We could play with adding > faceting to images.... Not worth the trouble; retaining an old-style pcolor with faceting that can be turned on is good enough support for the faceted use case--if anyone is even using it. Eric ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Matplotlib-devel mailing list Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
