On 05/30/2010 05:54 AM, John Hunter wrote: > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 5:18 AM, Jouni K. Seppänen<j...@iki.fi> wrote: > >> I agree that there should be a release before the transition. > > I was initially reluctant to do a release before the transition > because of the get_sample_data issue. I was worried that some 1.x > releases would point to the sf site and some to the github site. I am > less concerned about that now because we can simply keep the old data > on the sf site and so releases pointing to it will continue to work > for the vast majority of examples, and because Jouni has verified that > the same code works on sf and github modulo a url change. > > I will invest some time in the upcoming week getting ready for the > release. We can target a release candidate for testing a week from > now. Everyone who has some free time should tackle outstanding bugs > on the tracker. I am aware of a compile problem on solaris with CXX6 > that we now use, so I will see if I can make some progress on that. >
John, Do you have in mind a dual release--maintenance branch and trunk--or is v0_99_maint abandoned with no release? Another option would be to make a 99 release ASAP and delay the 1.0. Eric > JDH > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-devel mailing list > Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Matplotlib-devel mailing list Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
