------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This
SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
What
if a user decides later that he/she wants to install basemap? Then
they would have to reinstall matplotlib? That doesn't sound reasonable
to me.
How about having matplotlib install a symlink to the egg
location?
Why the change to using setuptools by default in the
first place?
-Jeff
If I do a
clean install of mpl
master, and then of basemap, basemap
lands in dist-packages/mpl_toolkits, as it always has. But now it is
not found--I can't import it. It seems that now the *real* mpl_toolkits
is cleverly hidden inside an egg directory with a monstrous name,
leaving basemap orphaned in a directory with no __init__.py. As a
workaround I can symlink it into the egg location. I suspect the real
solution will require basemap to use setuptools, correct? I don't know
how to do this, so I hope someone who does will submit a PR.
Eric
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
If I do a clean install of mpl
master, and then of basemap, basemap
lands in dist-packages/mpl_toolkits, as it always has. But now it is
not found--I can't import it. It seems that now the *real* mpl_toolkits
is cleverly hidden inside an egg directory with a monstrous name,
leaving basemap orphaned in a directory with no __init__.py. As a
workaround I can symlink it into the egg location. I suspect the real
solution will require basemap to use setuptools, correct? I don't know
how to do this, so I hope someone who does will submit a PR.
Eric