>>You can try:
>>xticklabels = getp(gca(), 'xticklabels')
>>yticklabels = getp(gca(), 'yticklabels')
>>setp(xticklabels, fontsize=14, weight='bold')
>>setp(yticklabels, fontsize=14, weight='bold')
I've tried this, but since I've set rc('text', usetex=True), the ticklabels
are only responsive to fontsize but not to weight. That is at least my
experience. Am I doing something wrong?
I've been trying to solve my problem by replacing the ticklabels with
strings. I know this is a very inelegant workaround, but I am running out of
ideas. I've tried two approaches that haven't worked successfully. (I don't
get error messages, but nothing changes in the plot):
Approach 1:
x_labels = ['\boldmath $10^22$','\boldmath $10^23$','\boldmath $10^24$']
ax1.set_xticklabels(x_labels)
Approach 2:
Inspired by http://old.nabble.com/axis-on-top-for-barh-plot-td26549035.html
this post :
ax1.xaxis.set_major_locator(ticker.FixedLocator(range(3)))
ax1.xaxis.set_major_formatter(ticker.FixedFormatter(x_labels))
>>Those are nice looking plots. It would be nice them to be shared on mpl's
>>gallery or as an example :)
Thanks! I'd be happy to share my code with everyone. It is not very nicely
written, but I can fix it up. What steps should I take? Everything I've
learned is from examples. This is just an amalgamation of expressions I've
found on the web.
Cheers, Daniel
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Bold-Latex-Tick-Labels-tp28037900p28045728.html
Sent from the matplotlib - users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Matplotlib-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users
