Thanks for the answer, simple and just what I need

I had not thought about that option

Álvaro

On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:57 AM, RAVIKUMAR V <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hai Álvaro ,
>
>
>
> This is the answer from Dr Ray Zimmerman for the same type of question in
> the previous post.
>
>      1. Can we use the 'runopf' for power loss minimization.
>
> If you give all of the generators equal linear costs, then the OPF will
> implicitly minimize losses (the only way to reduce costs is by reducing
> losses).
>
> Change the cost function as linear (see table B.4 generator cost data for
> format).
>
> bye.
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Álvaro Jaramillo Duque <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I am new in the list and also new user of MATPOWER .
>>
>> I will like to use MATPOWER to minimize the active power losses (part
>> of my PhD work). I read the documentation, the chapter "Extending the
>> OPF" explain how to add some cost functions, but there a similar way
>> to replace the the objective function?
>>
>> I am familiar with interior point method and developing under
>> matlab/octave. I read part of the MATPOWER code and I will like to
>> code the objective function to minimize the active power losses. But I
>> get lose in some parts, mainly where is created the Hessian matrix.
>>
>> There is something developed in this area? or can you get me some
>> recommendation to code this objective function.
>>
>> And before to say good bye, I will like to say that is a really good
>> news to see the change on the license to the GPL. I will try to make
>> some contributions to the project or at least to promote the  MATPOWER
>> use.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Álvaro Jaramillo Duque
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> WITH REGARDS,
>
> V.RAVIKUMAR PANDI,
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> HAVE A NICE DAY
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>

Reply via email to