Another question is this: when I have not fixed loads only I have
dispatchable loads how can I define power factor for generators and loads
separately?

Best Wishes

Carlos

On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 13:53, Carlos Gonzalez Almeida <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear Prof. Zimmerman
>
> Thanks a lot for your useful guidance.
>
> For example, in the attached file for a simple case study with 2 loads and
> generators I want to have a power factor 0.95. I have problem with adjusting
> power factor in MATPOWER. How can I do it in the attached file? Also I don't
> know why I have voltage constraint 1.5 pu. I think because of these
> constraints I have a little bit difference in the value of lambda
> I have done runmarket with the following offers and bids.
> Could you please tell me why?
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++
> mpc0 = loadcase('case4gs1');
> mpc = load2disp(mpc0);
> mkt.OPF = 'AC';
> offers.P.qty = [100;70];
> offers.P.prc = [50;100];
> bids.P.qty = [50 ;70 ];
> bids.P.prc = [150 ;130 ];
> [r, co, cb] = runmarket(mpc, offers, bids, mkt);
> co.P.qty
> co.P.prc
> cb.P.qty
> cb.P.prc
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Best Wishes
>
> C. Gonzalez Almeida
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 19:47, Ray Zimmerman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Carlos,
>>
>> I'm not sure what you mean by "test the example ... regarding zero power
>> factor". If you are going to change some of the existing dispatchable loads
>> to have a zero power factor, then the existing market structure for the
>> example, which includes only $/MW bids for active power, will not be
>> applicable. So you need to decide how you want to handle these reactive-only
>> loads. I suppose you'll need to specify reactive power bids for them.
>>
>> On your second question, the offers and bids are used to construct a
>> gencost matrix with negative costs for the negative generators that
>> represent dispatchable loads. The objective function is then to minimize
>> this "cost" of generation, which is computed in opf_costfcn.m. You are
>> correct that this is equivalent to maximizing social welfare.
>>
>> --
>>  Ray Zimmerman
>> Senior Research Associate
>> 211 Warren Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
>> phone: (607) 255-9645
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mar 8, 2011, at 5:04 PM, Carlos Gonzalez Almeida wrote:
>>
>> Dear Dr. Zimmerman
>>
>> -Could you please test the example provided in the manual (t_auction_case)
>> regarding zero power factor. What changes should be carried out?
>>
>> -Moreover, as you know, the objective function obtained in the runmarket
>> is Social welfare. Could you please address me the file that you calculated
>> objective function because I couldn't find it.  I want to know in which file
>> (the m file) you have calculated that?
>>
>> Best Regards
>>
>> Carlos
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 22:34, Ray Zimmerman <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not really sure without seeing the details of your example. I'm not
>>> sure I've ever tested the runmarket code with pure reactive power loads.
>>> It would require reactive power bids for those loads, but I'll need the
>>> details to be able to help you further.
>>>
>>>  --
>>> Ray Zimmerman
>>> Senior Research Associate
>>> 211 Warren Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
>>> phone: (607) 255-9645
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mar 7, 2011, at 10:42 AM, Carlos Gonzalez Almeida wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I am new in MATPOWER abd I want to have zero power factor for example in
>>> example case of manual in runmarket, but several error are occured. please
>>> tell me why
>>>
>>>
>>> Best Wishes
>>>
>>> C. Gonzalez Almeida
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Best Wishes
>>
>> C. Gonzalez Almeida
>>
>>
>>
>
>
  • PF Carlos Gonzalez Almeida
    • Re: PF Ray Zimmerman
      • Re: PF Carlos Gonzalez Almeida
        • Re: PF Ray Zimmerman
          • Re: PF Carlos Gonzalez Almeida
            • PF Carlos Gonzalez Almeida
              • Re: PF Carlos Gonzalez Almeida

Reply via email to