See my response to Roberto Carvalini, posted only seconds ago. Am I fast or 
what?  ;-)

-- 
Ray Zimmerman
Senior Research Associate
211 Warren Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
phone: (607) 255-9645



On Mar 11, 2011, at 10:16 AM, Carlos Gonzalez Almeida wrote:

> Thank you very much.
> 
> Could you please give me an example about defining power factor for 
> generators?
> 
> I cannot set it.
> 
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 16:09, Ray Zimmerman <[email protected]> wrote:
> Carlos,
> 
> If you want the loads to have a power factor of 0.95, you need to set QD such 
> that PD/sqrt(PD^2 + QD^2) = 0.95, i.e. QD has to equal 0.108 * PD. About the 
> voltage constraint of 1.5 p.u., I don't see that anywhere, so I'm not sure 
> what you are referring to. The different lambdas at the two buses are due to 
> losses. The power factor of the generators is determined by the solution 
> algorithm within the bounds set for them. That is, each generator has a 
> feasible "box" defined by PMIN, PMAX, QMIN and QMAX. You don't normally "set" 
> the power factor of a generator as input to the OPF. I suppose, if for some 
> reason you have a strict power factor constraint on a generator you could use 
> some additional linear constraints to the OPF to enforce it, but that would 
> be unusual I think.
> 
> -- 
> Ray Zimmerman
> Senior Research Associate
> 211 Warren Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
> phone: (607) 255-9645
> 
> 
> 
> On Mar 10, 2011, at 8:10 AM, Carlos Gonzalez Almeida wrote:
> 
>> Another question is this: when I have not fixed loads only I have 
>> dispatchable loads how can I define power factor for generators and loads 
>> separately?
>> 
>> Best Wishes
>> 
>> Carlos
>> 
>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 13:53, Carlos Gonzalez Almeida 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Dear Prof. Zimmerman
>> 
>> Thanks a lot for your useful guidance.
>> 
>> For example, in the attached file for a simple case study with 2 loads and 
>> generators I want to have a power factor 0.95. I have problem with adjusting 
>> power factor in MATPOWER. How can I do it in the attached file? Also I don't 
>> know why I have voltage constraint 1.5 pu. I think because of these 
>> constraints I have a little bit difference in the value of lambda
>> I have done runmarket with the following offers and bids. 
>> Could you please tell me why? 
>> 
>> +++++++++++++++++++++
>> mpc0 = loadcase('case4gs1');
>> mpc = load2disp(mpc0);
>> mkt.OPF = 'AC';
>> offers.P.qty = [100;70];
>> offers.P.prc = [50;100];
>> bids.P.qty = [50 ;70 ];
>> bids.P.prc = [150 ;130 ];
>> [r, co, cb] = runmarket(mpc, offers, bids, mkt);
>> co.P.qty
>> co.P.prc
>> cb.P.qty
>> cb.P.prc
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 
>> Best Wishes
>> 
>> C. Gonzalez Almeida
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 19:47, Ray Zimmerman <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Carlos,
>> 
>> I'm not sure what you mean by "test the example ... regarding zero power 
>> factor". If you are going to change some of the existing dispatchable loads 
>> to have a zero power factor, then the existing market structure for the 
>> example, which includes only $/MW bids for active power, will not be 
>> applicable. So you need to decide how you want to handle these reactive-only 
>> loads. I suppose you'll need to specify reactive power bids for them.
>> 
>> On your second question, the offers and bids are used to construct a gencost 
>> matrix with negative costs for the negative generators that represent 
>> dispatchable loads. The objective function is then to minimize this "cost" 
>> of generation, which is computed in opf_costfcn.m. You are correct that this 
>> is equivalent to maximizing social welfare.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Ray Zimmerman
>> Senior Research Associate
>> 211 Warren Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
>> phone: (607) 255-9645
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Mar 8, 2011, at 5:04 PM, Carlos Gonzalez Almeida wrote:
>> 
>>> Dear Dr. Zimmerman
>>> 
>>> -Could you please test the example provided in the manual (t_auction_case) 
>>> regarding zero power factor. What changes should be carried out?
>>> 
>>> -Moreover, as you know, the objective function obtained in the runmarket is 
>>> Social welfare. Could you please address me the file that you calculated 
>>> objective function because I couldn't find it.  I want to know in which 
>>> file (the m file) you have calculated that?
>>> 
>>> Best Regards
>>> 
>>> Carlos
>>> 
>>>   
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 22:34, Ray Zimmerman <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> I'm not really sure without seeing the details of your example. I'm not 
>>> sure I've ever tested the runmarket code with pure reactive power loads. It 
>>> would require reactive power bids for those loads, but I'll need the 
>>> details to be able to help you further.
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Ray Zimmerman
>>> Senior Research Associate
>>> 211 Warren Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
>>> phone: (607) 255-9645
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mar 7, 2011, at 10:42 AM, Carlos Gonzalez Almeida wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi
>>>> 
>>>> I am new in MATPOWER abd I want to have zero power factor for example in 
>>>> example case of manual in runmarket, but several error are occured. please 
>>>> tell me why
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Best Wishes
>>>> 
>>>> C. Gonzalez Almeida
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Best Wishes
>>> 
>>> C. Gonzalez Almeida
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Best Wishes
> 
> C. Gonzalez Almeida

  • PF Carlos Gonzalez Almeida
    • Re: PF Ray Zimmerman
      • Re: PF Carlos Gonzalez Almeida
        • Re: PF Ray Zimmerman
          • Re: PF Carlos Gonzalez Almeida
            • PF Carlos Gonzalez Almeida
              • Re: PF Carlos Gonzalez Almeida
                • Re: PF Ray Zimmerman
                • Re: PF Carlos Gonzalez Almeida
                • Re: PF Ray Zimmerman
                • Re: PF Carlos Gonzalez Almeida
                • PF Carlos Gonzalez Almeida
                • Re: PF Ray Zimmerman
                • Re: PF Carlos Gonzalez Almeida
                • Re: PF Carlos Gonzalez Almeida
                • Re: PF Ray Zimmerman
                • Re: PF Carlos Gonzalez Almeida
                • Re: PF Carlos Gonzalez Almeida
                • Re: PF Ray Zimmerman
                • Re: PF Carlos Gonzalez Almeida

Reply via email to