That's what I suspected. I used 4.0b1. I didn't tell it to use anything other than the default, so I think it's a fairly safe assumption that that is what was used.
Thanks, Jared Kline On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Ray Zimmerman <[email protected]> wrote: > It appears that this was added in MATPOWER 4.0b2, so the results you sent > must have been generated by an earlier version of MATPOWER. Unfortunately, I > don't think there is anything in that data that we can use to determine which > OPF algorithm was used. > > -- > Ray Zimmerman > Senior Research Associate > 211 Warren Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 > phone: (607) 255-9645 > > > > On Jul 13, 2011, at 12:51 PM, Jared Kline wrote: > >> Prof. Zimmerman, >> >> I apologize for the slow response. I don't see an "output" structure >> within results.raw. I have attached the input and output data from >> one of my simulation runs. Can you help me figure out which OPF >> algorithm was used? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jared Kline >> >> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Ray Zimmerman <[email protected]> wrote: >>> results = runopf(...); >>> results.raw.output.alg >>> >>> On Mar 20, 2011, at 6:32 PM, Jared Kline wrote: >>> >>> I have several OPF cases that I ran using MatPower's default settings. >>> I have version 4.0b1. Is there any way to determine which solver was >>> used to execute these? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Jared Kline >>> >>> >>> >> <optimal36.mat> > > > >
