The voltage angle at the REF bus is held constant at whatever value is in the 
VA column of the bus matrix for that bus. Often, it is bus 1 and the angle is 
set to zero, but this is not necessary.

-- 
Ray Zimmerman
Senior Research Associate
419A Warren Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
phone: (607) 255-9645




On May 1, 2013, at 5:14 PM, Aftognosia Aftognosia <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> Dear Dr Zimmerman,
> 
> In an ACOPF, the Matpower seems to set Voltage_angle(bus1) = 0 . 
> However, this is not required - although it is not a mistake. Is it 
> compulsory to set this voltage_angle zero?
> 
> Thank you
> From: Ray Zimmerman <[email protected]>
> To: MATPOWER discussion forum <[email protected]> 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2013 5:26 PM
> Subject: Re: P_V curve
> 
> MATPOWER does not compute the L-index directly. However, you may find the 
> contributed (i.e. unsupported) continuation power flow code useful for 
> finding PV curves. See cpf in Appendix E in the User's Manual.
> 
> -- 
> Ray Zimmerman
> Senior Research Associate
> 419A Warren Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
> phone: (607) 255-9645
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Apr 30, 2013, at 7:49 AM, Khirad Dhabhar <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Dear all
>> 
>> In my project . Optimal placement of FACTS device i have run the ACOPF for 
>> an IEEE 30 bus and then using the Lambda values i have determined the bus at 
>> which to connect my facts device. Now i would like to find the voltage 
>> stability index for the base system and the system with the facts device. 
>> This is to show that the voltage stability index increases with the 
>> placement of FACTS device(I.E the L-index moves closer to 0). I downloaded a 
>> paper called "A comparison of voltage stability indices for placing Shunt 
>> FACTS controllers",by A.R.Phadke, S.K.Bansal and K.R.Niazi. In this paper 
>> they use the L index as a criteria. How can i calculate the L-index in 
>> matpower. 
>> 
>> thanks khirad
>>   
>> 
>> -- 
>> Friendship is like a red rose with a green stem
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to