There are no "losses penalty factors" in the formulation. It sounds like you are assuming DC formulation with additional loss factors. Our DC formulation is lossless, so is likely what you are looking for.
-- Ray Zimmerman Senior Research Associate B30 Warren Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 phone: (607) 255-9645 On Jul 10, 2013, at 4:18 PM, Dionisis Stamatiadis <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you for your answer. I do not want to include the losses in the > Lagrange equation, or in other words I want the optimisation process to > neglect the losses penalty factors associated with every bus. > ---------------------------------------- >> Subject: Re: exclude losses from opf >> From: [email protected] >> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 16:04:39 -0400 >> To: [email protected] >> >> I'm not sure what you mean by having losses "not be taken into consideration >> by the opf" without "eliminating" them. I don't think you can have it both >> ways. If you want an OPF based on a lossless approximation to the network, I >> see two options … (1) a DC OPF or (2) an AC OPF with the branch resistances >> set to zero. >> >> -- >> Ray Zimmerman >> Senior Research Associate >> B30 Warren Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 >> phone: (607) 255-9645 >> >> >> >> >> >> On Jul 10, 2013, at 2:46 PM, Dionisis Stamatiadis >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> I was wondering if is there any way to exclude the losses when running an >>> opf. I do not want to eliminate the losses (R=0 X=0) but to not be taken >>> into consideration by the opf. >>> Thank you, >>> Dionisis >>> >> >> >> >
