Are you using BFGS approximated Hessian via the fmincon function or computing 
it yourself? What happens if you use your computed Hessian with the interior 
point scheme in fmincon?

Shri

From: amel zerigui <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: MATPOWER discussion forum 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:38:03 +0000
To: MATPOWER discussion forum 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: RE: Hessian problem



But he problem can be solved with Active set option correctly, by using the 
same stating point.
Thanks

________________________________
From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Hessian problem
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 09:31:56 -0500
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

It is impossible for me to know. It may in fact not be a problem with either, 
but rather that the problem you specified is infeasible. But, as I said, I have 
no way of knowing.

--
Ray Zimmerman
Senior Research Associate
B30 Warren Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
phone: (607) 255-9645



On Feb 10, 2014, at 8:44 AM, amel zerigui 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Hi,
I changed the equality constraints of matpower by adding new constraints, in 
same way I changed also the Jacobian matrix, and when I checked the computed 
first derivative, I found this result:

Nonlinear equality constraint derivatives:
Maximum relative discrepancy between derivatives = 4.44985e-009

This mean the modification is correct, then I estimated the hessian by using 
BFGS but the optimal point found is:

No feasible solution found.

I would like to know if the problem is Matlab problem or Matpower.

Thanks for help.




Reply via email to