I don’t have time to read the paper, so I’m not sure what the definition of “area” is in this context, but you can certainly assign buses to whatever definition of non-overlapping areas you choose. This has no effect on the physical system, however, and is just essentially a grouping and labeling convention that could be useful for certain applications. So, I’m not quite sure what you mean by being able to “decouple the system into multi areas”.
Ray > On Oct 24, 2014, at 10:54 PM, Gelli Ravikumar <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Dear Sir/s, > > In the literature, I have found a paper titled "Multiarea State Estimation > Using Synchronized Phasor Measurements", attached for your kind perusal. I'm > trying to implement the IEEE 118 case system in accordance with the > methodology proposed in the paper. But, I''m finding difficulties in > developing a program (matlab based) for decoupling the case118.m > (ref:MatPower) system into multi area system as mentioned in the paper. In > the paper, Fig. 6 directly shows the multi area depiction of the case 118 > system. Can anyone help me on how to prepare an algorithm so that, we can > decouple the system into multi areas. Or else, Is there any provision in the > MatPower to identify multi-areas in a system as mentioned in the paper. > > > > > -- > with Regards > ---------------------------------------------------- > Gelli Ravikumar > Research Scholar (Ph.D), > Field Computations Lab, > Dept. of Electrical Engineering, > IIT Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076 > Ph: 022-2576 4424, 089 765 983 96 > > Gandhian Young Technological Innovation Award - 2013 > POSOCO Power System Award: PPSA - 2013 > IITB PhD Executive Member - 2013-14 > IITB SARC Core Technical Member - 2014-15 > > > <Multi area state estimation using synchronized phasor measurements.pdf>
