It depends on the available solvers. I believe Gurobi, CPLEX and MOSEK can
handle MIQP models, but not intlinprog() from the Optimization Toolbox. So if
you need the integer commitment features, you will need limit yourself to
linear generator costs unless you can get access to a better solver. I highly
recommend Gurobi or CPLEX for use with MOST.
Ray
> On Oct 3, 2016, at 4:43 PM, YE lei <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Excuse me for interrupting you once again.I have another question.I noticed
> that if I set quadratic term coefficient of generating cost as non-zero
> number, it will shows "Sorry, no solver available for MIQP models". So,In
> MOST,Does it have to be zero?
>
>
> ------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
> 发件人: "rz10";<[email protected]>;
> 发送时间: 2016年10月4日(星期二) 凌晨3:01
> 收件人: "MATPOWER discussion forum"<[email protected]>;
> 主题: Re: a question about MOST
>
> If the RAMP_30 column of the gen matrix is set to zero this means that the
> generator cannot change its dispatch from one period to the next, since it
> has zero ramp capability. I think it should work if you set reasonable ramp
> rates.
>
> Ray
>
>
>
>> On Oct 3, 2016, at 1:26 PM, YE lei <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks a lot, now I try to edit load_profile like follow. After I ran
>> MOST, the result was still incorrect，it showed "No feasible solution
>> found"（but in this load value I can run the command of "runopf"
>> successfully） The load bus is 4,5,6.
>>
>> function loadprofile = ex160929_load_profile
>> [CT_LABEL, CT_PROB, CT_TABLE, CT_TBUS, CT_TGEN, CT_TBRCH, CT_TAREABUS, ...
>> CT_TAREAGEN, CT_TAREABRCH, CT_ROW, CT_COL, CT_CHGTYPE, CT_REP, ...
>> CT_REL, CT_ADD, CT_NEWVAL, CT_TLOAD, CT_TAREALOAD,BUS_I...
>> BUS_TYPE,PD,QD] = idx_ct;
>> loadprofile = struct( ...
>> 'type', 'mpcData', ...
>> 'table', CT_TBUS, ...
>> 'rows', [4;5;6], ...
>> 'col', PD, ...
>> 'chgtype', CT_REP, ...
>> 'values', [] );
>> loadprofile.values(:, 1, 1) = [
>> 45;
>> 43;
>> 40;
>> 40;
>> 39;
>> 41;
>> ]-1e-3;
>> loadprofile.values(:, 1, 2) = [
>> 97;
>> 92;
>> 89;
>> 85;
>> 87;
>> 90;
>> ]-1e-3;
>> loadprofile.values(:, 1, 3) = [
>> 36;
>> 33;
>> 32;
>> 32;
>> 32;
>> 32;
>> ]-1e-3;
>>
>> Did I modify load_profile right? I do not know what goes wrong...orz
>>
>>
>> ------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
>> 发件人: "Ray Zimmerman";<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>;
>> 发送时间: 2016年10月4日(星期二) 凌晨1:04
>> 收件人: "MATPOWER discussion forum"<[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>>;
>> 主题: Re: a question about MOST
>>
>> The 3rd dimension of loadprofile.values is only 3, corresponding to the
>> length of loadprofile.rows. So when you assign the data it should be to
>> loadprofile.values(:, 1, 1), loadprofile.values(:, 1, 2), and
>> loadprofile.values(:, 1, 3), not indexes 4, 5 and 6.
>>
>> Ray
>>
>>
>>> On Sep 29, 2016, at 1:21 PM, YE lei <[email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Recently, I was learning MOST in the MATPOWER, and I got a question.
>>> When I wanted to do an experiment, I found that I do not know how to modify
>>> the load value of each load bus in each period. The example only have one
>>> load bus in MOST manual. If I have 3 load bus("case6ww.m" file on the root
>>> directory of MATPOWER) and load value series as fig-1, how to edit
>>> "ex_load_profile.m" file(D:\MatLab\toolbox\matpower6.0b1\most\t) ?
>>>
>>> <[email protected]> fig-1
>>> I edited ex_load_profile.m like fig-2, and it can not run correctly.
>>> <[email protected]> fig-2
>>>
>>> Could you help me to edit ex_load_profile.m correctly？
>>
>
