Hi, I suppose your TCSC is just a reactance that you can add/subtract.
The SSSC device is more complex because it is a voltage source. If you want to properly model it you will have to include the regulation criteria which, with the established method, also needs an expansion of the Jacobi that searches for the angle and amplitude of the voltage source. The most renowned method for the SSSC modelling is the one developped by Zhang: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1245565/http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1245565/ As it has been found that convergence for the voltage source SSSC modelling method is terrible a current flow method was later developped: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142061511001347http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142061511001347 The StatCom and other 2nd generation FACTS can use a similar approach to the SSSC. Coincidentally, we are currently working on implementing a method that models the device by altering the power loads in the input data and will likely make it available to MatPower. We will model the SSSC device by power injections using a Newton method. regards, Gorazd ________________________________ Od: [email protected] [[email protected]] v imenu Ahmad Sadiq Abubakar [[email protected]] Poslano: 25. maj 2017 13:21 Za: MATPOWER discussion forum Zadeva: FACTS Models in MATPOWER Hi all, Can anybody advice on FACTS reprersentation in MATPOWER? OR How do i model FACTS (e.g. TCSC or SSSC or STATCOM) to be included in power flow rountines (e.g. runpf, runcpf or runopf) of MATPOWER. Best regards. Engr. AHMAD, Abubakar Sadiq PhD Student Electrical Engineering. Bayero University, Kano. Nigeria. OR Lecturer Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Federal University of Technology, P.M.B, 65, Minna. Nigeria. +2347068043665
