Again, the easiest way to accomplish this may be by adding a set of (negative)
generators to represent these other demands. You can then add constraints to
restrict them as needed.
Ray
> On Nov 27, 2018, at 8:13 AM, Sergio Garcia Marin <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the reply Ray,
>
> I think I can achieve the non-supply demand througout dispatchable loads. But
> what if I want to add a demand that is also a variable of other
> sircumstances, then I would need specific varibles to model this demands and
> also a way to add them into the power nodal balance equations... I'll keep
> working on this.
>
>
> <http://www.gipem.co/>
>
>
> El lun., 26 nov. 2018 a las 14:40, Ray Zimmerman (<[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>>) escribió:
> Currently MATPOWER does not provide a way to eliminate or modify the existing
> power balance constraints. However, can you accomplish what you want with a
> set of appropriately priced and constrained generators? Or with dispatchable
> loads?
>
> Ray
>
>
>> On Nov 22, 2018, at 9:37 AM, Sergio Garcia Marin <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I want to use the extended OPF formulation but i need to modify the power
>> flow implicit constraints, or better, eliminate them to created my own ones
>> i.e. I want to add non-supply demand as a varible with high cost, so i need
>> to include this into the nodal power equations balance, if I add this
>> constraints in the extended formulation, would this be in conflict with the
>> implicitd nodal balance constraints included in matpower?
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> Sergio G.M.
>> UNAL-Mz
>> <http://www.gipem.co/>
>
