I could be wrong, but I would be very, very surprised if the near singular 
matrix issue is related to modeling the shunt susceptances as generators. The 
only other idea I have is to call the OPF iteratively as a subroutine with 
fixed shunt susceptances that you update according to your own optimization at 
each iteration.

Regarding PV, PQ switching during the power flow, have a look at the 
pf.enforce_q_lims option (help mpoption or Table 4-2 or Table C-2 in the manual 
<http://www.pserc.cornell.edu/matpower/docs/MATPOWER-manual-7.0b1.pdf>).

   Ray


> On Apr 9, 2019, at 11:50 AM, Morteza Dabbaghjamanesh <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Thanks for your reply.  I have been able to fix the problem but can you 
> suggest any alternative way of converting the OPF parameters as variables 
> because I guess adding the shunt susceptances as generators is taking the 
> matrix close to singularity as I am getting some warning.
> 
> One more question, does matpower do PV , PQ switching while solving the Power 
> Flow?
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> From: [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]> 
> <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Ray 
> Zimmerman <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2019 9:00:08 AM
> To: MATPOWER discussion forum
> Subject: Re: Using conventional parameters as variables in opf
>  
> If it is not converging, it is likely (though not absolutely certain) that 
> the problem is infeasible. I suggest that you try turning on soft limits to 
> see if the OPF will converge with a few constraint violations. That can show 
> you which are the conflicting constraints. MATPOWER 7.0b1 has a much improved 
> soft-limit capability, so definitely get 7.0b1 if you don’t already have it. 
> See Section 7.6.4 in the MATPOWER User’s Manual 
> <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pserc.cornell.edu%2Fmatpower%2Fdocs%2FMATPOWER-manual-7.0b1.pdf&data=02%7C01%7Cmdabba1%40lsu.edu%7C4408f617aac34e94430508d6bcf44c8c%7C2d4dad3f50ae47d983a09ae2b1f466f8%7C0%7C1%7C636904154789136793&sdata=DDTg7q5v80XefxFe1CqdIZ9d07p%2FPWHdg4NfdJo%2FctY%3D&reserved=0>
>  for more details on OPF soft limits.
> 
> Then do …
> 
> mpc = loadcase('<your case>');
> mpc = toggle_softlims(mpc, 'on');
> r = runopf(mpc);
> 
> Oh, and by the way, PQ vs PV makes no difference for the OPF, only for the 
> power flow.
> 
> Hope this helps,
> 
>    Ray
> 
> 
>> On Apr 1, 2019, at 11:51 PM, Morteza Dabbaghjamanesh <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I have already set the Vmax and Vmin in mpc.bus section to Vg but the 
>> condition gets worse, the OPF is not converging now. Previously, though I 
>> have seen convergence but I have voltage violation almost in every buses of 
>> my system and this is also happening now. Do you have any idea why this is 
>> happening or how to get rid of this issue? Does switching from PQ to PV bus 
>> seems reasonable to you?
>> 
>> If you can suggest some alternative way even it is difficult, it will be of 
>> great help to me.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> 
>> Get Outlook for iOS 
>> <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2Fo0ukef&data=02%7C01%7Cmdabba1%40lsu.edu%7C4408f617aac34e94430508d6bcf44c8c%7C2d4dad3f50ae47d983a09ae2b1f466f8%7C0%7C1%7C636904154789146798&sdata=V51GeAyTN7fm%2Bod5JR1zX61GCnPDO1ZSqzsMhZQSyx4%3D&reserved=0>
>>  
>> From: [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]> on behalf of Ray 
>> Zimmerman <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> Sent: Monday, April 1, 2019 5:25 PM
>> To: MATPOWER discussion forum
>> Subject: Re: Using conventional parameters as variables in opf
>>  
>> There is not an easy way to convert a parameter (like shunt susceptance) to 
>> an OPF variable. The approach you are already taking is what I would 
>> suggest. It sounds like you may  not have set VMIN and VMAX to the desired 
>> voltage (VG).
>> 
>> On your second question, yes, the gencost matrix is always assumed to be 
>> ordered exactly the same as the gen matrix. That is, row i in one 
>> corresponds to row i in the other.
>> 
>>     Ray
>> 
>> 
>>> On Apr 1, 2019, at 11:03 AM, Morteza Dabbaghjamanesh <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I was wondering whether there is any way of converting a parameter into a 
>>> variable in OPF. Say for example, if I want to convert the shunt 
>>> susceptance which is usually passed as a parameter to the OPF , to a 
>>> variable, what is the easiest way of doing it. 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Currently, I am considering shunts as reactive generators which can only 
>>> produce reactive power and no real power, to implement that, I have 
>>> appended new rows equal to the number of shunt buses in the generator 
>>> section of mpc data. Then I set the 'Pg','Pmax' and 'Pmin' to zero. I 
>>> collected the voltage from the bus data section and passed it to the 'Vg' 
>>> of the new added rows. I have also added some rows in the generator cost 
>>> section (appended at the last of the existing cost of the generators). I 
>>> have set the 'Qmax' and 'Qmin' from my maximum and minimum shunt 
>>> susceptance. I have also changed the bus types to 'PV' from 'PQ' mode (in 
>>> applicable cases). Though I am having an OPF solution but looking at the 
>>> results there are voltage limit violation in almost every buses. Can you 
>>> please suggest what could be the solution of this problem?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Another issue is, if I add any new generator to the power flow data, then 
>>> should I add the generator cost information at the end of the existing 
>>> generator cost or should I insert them as per the index of the generators. 
>>> 
>>> Best regards, 
>>> Morteza Dabbaghjamanesh

Reply via email to