Dear list, I’m relative new to the field, so maybe my suggestions are not useful.
for the standard PFEs F(x), the unknowns within x are voltage magnitudes and angles. So, my suggestion is to implement the general purpose algorithm to enforce constraints on x when solving J_F dx = -F(x) within the Newton-Raphson method that you can find in: https://computation.llnl.gov/projects/sundials/kinsol Giulio Masetti, PhD student at Computer Science Department, University of Pisa, [email protected], Research associate at SEDC Lab, ISTI-CNR Pisa, [email protected], Web page: http://pages.di.unipi.it/masetti Phone: (+39) 050 315 2909 > On 8 Oct 2018, at 15:34, Ray Zimmerman <[email protected]> wrote: > > You are right that runpf() does not enforce voltage limits, but rather > voltage set points of the generators. If you want to enforce voltage limits > at all buses you will either have to use an OPF, or implement your own > algorithm to control the generator voltage set points, switched shunt caps, > transformer taps, etc. > > Ray > > > >> On Oct 4, 2018, at 1:27 PM, Mohammadreza Chamanbaz >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Dear All >> >> I have designed generators active power and their voltage for an uncertain >> network where there is uncertainty associated with loads and renewable >> generators. >> >> To test the feasibility of my design I need to run some Monte-Carlo >> simulation and see if the control variables I have designed are robust >> enough. For this reason, I use runpf command to obtain line flows and bus >> voltages. It looks to me that matpower runpf command does not respect bus >> voltage constraints (I might be wrong). Is there a way to enforce voltage >> constraints in runpf command? >> >> Regards, >> Mohammadreza >
