Hi, > b) contain code that is distributed under an OSI approved license [6], > prefereably ECL 2.0.
If we are going to require a license I prefer it to be required that we use ECL 2.0. So there are no questions in the future or muddy wading through svn logs. And I prefer that everyone with access have a CLA assigned. Does this seem unreasonable? Chris -- Christopher Brooks, BSc, MSc ARIES Laboratory, University of Saskatchewan Web: http://www.cs.usask.ca/~cab938 Phone: 1.306.966.1442 Mail: Advanced Research in Intelligent Educational Systems Laboratory Department of Computer Science University of Saskatchewan 176 Thorvaldson Building 110 Science Place Saskatoon, SK S7N 5C9 _______________________________________________ Matterhorn-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users
